Compare

Spotlight is good
until the name is all you remember

This is not a "Spotlight replacement" manifesto. Spotlight is an excellent general search — but it has to serve contents, mail, the web, dictionaries and Siri suggestions all at once. Locseek takes one of those facets and drives it to milliseconds.

An honest division of labour

What each one is good at

ScenarioLocseekSpotlight
You remember the name, or part of it, and want it now✓ MillisecondsSometimes spins, or mixes in other categories
Files on external drives, USB sticks and NAS✓ All in scope (Pro)Coverage varies by volume and settings
Hidden files and the inside of .app bundles✓ In scope by defaultUsually not shown
node_modules, .git, build artifactsExcluded by default; Pro can allowUsually not shown
Filtering by regex, size, date and path together✓ One line (Pro)
Finding files by their contents (full text)Out of scope
Mail, messages, web, dictionary, conversionsOut of scope

We put the "out of scope" rows in plain sight: because Locseek's index holds only names and metadata, it is lighter on your disk, friendlier to your privacy — and faster at the one thing it does.

Why name search deserves its own tool

Because it is the shortest path

Small index, therefore fast

Nothing is parsed, so both index size and memory stay tiny — around 24 MB of physical memory just after launch, and no more than 150 MB of index at a million entries (internal benchmarking, terms here). It barely disturbs your Mac.

Clear boundaries, therefore accurate

Results come only from file and folder names, ranked transparently: exact > prefix > word-start > contains, with recent modification breaking ties. No algorithmic black box.

Data stays put

No network, no telemetry. What you searched for, and what files you have, is known only to this Mac.

The pairing we suggest:keep using Spotlight for broad retrieval (⌘Space), and put Locseek on ⌥Space for going straight to a file by name. They do not interfere with each other.